Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code

DAI You-qin, MAO Rong-rong. Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2009, 27(3): 195-197,204.
Citation: DAI You-qin, MAO Rong-rong. Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2009, 27(3): 195-197,204.

Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories

  • Received Date: 2009-03-19
  • Objective :To compare the dissolution in vitro of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories so as to make a reference to clinical application of felodipine tablets. Methods :The dissolubility of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories was inspected in the following 5 mediums:water,pH 1.2 artificial gastric juice,pH 4.0 acetate buffer solution,pH 6.8 phosphate buffer solution(the above 4 mediums were used according to the project of drug quality's re-evaluation in Japan)and the mediums that used in ChP 2005.The dissolution tests were proceeded using paddle method at 50 r/min. Results :The cumulative dissolution of all felodipine tablets in 30 min was over 80% when the mediums regulated in ChP 2005 was used.However,when the mediums that regulated in the project of drug quality's re-evaluation in Japan were used,only the products of one manufacture could dissolved over 90% in 6h. Conclusion :The dissolution of the same batch of felodipine tablets in different mediums verifies obviously.There are significant difference among the quality of the felodipine tablets of different pharmaceutical factories,which should be given attention to in clinical application.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 93.4 %FULLTEXT: 93.4 %META: 1.7 %META: 1.7 %PDF: 4.9 %PDF: 4.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 75.5 %其他: 75.5 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %伊犁: 0.0 %伊犁: 0.0 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %南充: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.0 %呼伦贝尔: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %大理: 0.2 %大理: 0.2 %天水: 0.0 %天水: 0.0 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %安阳: 0.3 %安阳: 0.3 %安顺: 0.0 %安顺: 0.0 %定西: 0.0 %定西: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.3 %宝鸡: 0.3 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平凉: 0.0 %平凉: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %恩施: 0.0 %恩施: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %文山: 0.0 %文山: 0.0 %日喀则: 0.0 %日喀则: 0.0 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %曲靖: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %本溪: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %梧州: 0.0 %梧州: 0.0 %楚雄: 0.1 %楚雄: 0.1 %榆林: 0.0 %榆林: 0.0 %武威: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %汉中: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %江门: 0.0 %江门: 0.0 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.0 %沧州: 0.0 %河池: 0.0 %河池: 0.0 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮安: 0.0 %淮安: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %滨州: 0.3 %滨州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %玉林: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %琼中: 0.0 %琼中: 0.0 %白银: 0.3 %白银: 0.3 %百色: 0.0 %百色: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %绥化: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %罗利: 0.0 %罗利: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %肇庆: 0.0 %肇庆: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 1.2 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.0 %莱芜: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 3.9 %西宁: 3.9 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵港: 0.1 %贵港: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赣州: 0.3 %赣州: 0.3 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %辽阳: 0.0 %辽阳: 0.0 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郴州: 0.0 %郴州: 0.0 %鄂尔多斯: 0.0 %鄂尔多斯: 0.0 %酒泉: 0.1 %酒泉: 0.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.2 %铜仁: 0.2 %铜陵: 0.0 %铜陵: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %防城港: 0.0 %防城港: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %鹤壁: 0.1 %鹤壁: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄石: 0.0 %黄石: 0.0 %黑河: 0.0 %黑河: 0.0 %黔东南: 0.0 %黔东南: 0.0 %黔西南: 0.0 %黔西南: 0.0 %其他ChinaRochester上海临汾乌鲁木齐九江伊犁保定信阳克孜勒苏兰州加利福尼亚州包头北京南充南宁南平南阳台州合肥吉安周口呼伦贝尔咸宁咸阳哈尔滨唐山商丘大理天水天津太原安康安阳安顺定西宜宾宜昌宜春宝鸡宿州宿迁常德平凉广元广安广州庆阳延安张家口恩施惠州抚州文山日喀则昆明曲靖朝阳本溪杭州柳州株洲桂林梧州楚雄榆林武威武汉汉中汕头江门池州沈阳沧州河池泰州泸州洛阳济南济宁海口淄博淮北淮安湖州湘潭湛江滨州漯河漳州潍坊濮阳玉林琼中白银百色石家庄绍兴绥化罗利聊城肇庆芒廷维尤苏州荆门莆田莱芜菏泽葫芦岛襄阳西宁西安贵港贵阳赣州赤峰辽阳达州运城通化遵义邢台邵阳郑州郴州鄂尔多斯酒泉重庆金华铜仁铜陵长春长沙阜阳防城港阳泉驻马店鹤壁黄冈黄石黑河黔东南黔西南Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(3191) PDF downloads(566) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories

Abstract: Objective :To compare the dissolution in vitro of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories so as to make a reference to clinical application of felodipine tablets. Methods :The dissolubility of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories was inspected in the following 5 mediums:water,pH 1.2 artificial gastric juice,pH 4.0 acetate buffer solution,pH 6.8 phosphate buffer solution(the above 4 mediums were used according to the project of drug quality's re-evaluation in Japan)and the mediums that used in ChP 2005.The dissolution tests were proceeded using paddle method at 50 r/min. Results :The cumulative dissolution of all felodipine tablets in 30 min was over 80% when the mediums regulated in ChP 2005 was used.However,when the mediums that regulated in the project of drug quality's re-evaluation in Japan were used,only the products of one manufacture could dissolved over 90% in 6h. Conclusion :The dissolution of the same batch of felodipine tablets in different mediums verifies obviously.There are significant difference among the quality of the felodipine tablets of different pharmaceutical factories,which should be given attention to in clinical application.

DAI You-qin, MAO Rong-rong. Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2009, 27(3): 195-197,204.
Citation: DAI You-qin, MAO Rong-rong. Comparison of dissolution of felodipine tablets of four pharmaceutical factories[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2009, 27(3): 195-197,204.

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return