Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code

CHEN Hui-jun, ZHU Qi-bing, YU Chang-fa. Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(3): 224-227,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019
Citation: CHEN Hui-jun, ZHU Qi-bing, YU Chang-fa. Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(3): 224-227,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019

Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019
  • Received Date: 2012-10-24
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-04-28
  • Objective To analyze the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital, and provide reference for the rational of antimicrobial drugs and management. Methods The SPSS13.0 software was used for statistical analysis of pathogenic bacteria drug resistance from the detected positive bacteria and its susceptibility test results in my hospital in 2011, combined with the annual antibiotics DDDs to analyze the rationality of antibacterial drug use. Results Among the positive samples were Gram-positive bacteria of 1927, accounting for 33.1% of the 5 822 cases. Separation of Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for in the first place(16.9%), followed by hemolytic Staphylococcus aureus(15.9%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis(14.1%).Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)(36.7%), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci(MRS-con)accounted for 82.5%, were resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, fusidic acid and teicoplanin better sensitivity, resistance rates did not exceed 6.47%;Gram-negative bacteria of 2 661, accounting for 45.7%, the separation of Gram-negative bacteria Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacteria, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae (23.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae(15.6%)and Enterobacter cloacae(3.7%), Enterobacteriaceae inhibitor-containing piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam are kept better sensitivity, resistance rates lower than 27.82%, amikacin rate of less than 14.36%;non-fermenting bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa(10.2%), calcium acetate Bowman Acinetobacter(7.9%) and Stenotrophomonas narrow mainly food Aeromonas.Non-fermenting bacteria to cefoperazone/sulbactam better sensitivity, resistance rates did not exceed 29.44%;Resistance to quinolones rate of more than 31.39%;third and fourth generation cephalosporin resistance rates of non-fermenting bacteria more than 35.19%;imipenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii rate of 81.32%.The most bacterial resistance rates with the use of antibiotics strength was positively correlated(r>0.3, P<0.05). Conclusion Bacterial drug resistance situation was more serious in my hospital.The use and management of antibiotics should be strengthened as soon as possible, and drugs should be selected according to clear pathogens andantimicrobial susceptibility test to reduce drug resistant bacteria produce.
  • [1] 卫生部抗菌药物临床应用监测网抗菌药物DDD值最新版(2011年8月)[2012-09-20] (http://www.chinadtc.org.cn/index.php?option=com_content&module=46&sortid=&artid=491&menuid=57).
    [2] 国家药典委员会.中国药典临床用药须知[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.
    [3] 陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:44.
    [4] 陈平雁,黄浙明.SPSS13.0统计软件应用教程[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:179.
    [5] 刑茂,刘同华,王琴.罗红霉素和阿奇霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的防耐药突变浓度的研究[J].第四军医大学学报,2009,30(8):757.
    [6] 朱德妹,汪复,胡付品,等.2010年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2011,11(5):321.
    [7] 耿嘉阳,段金菊.某院1998~2010年两种非发酵菌耐药率情况及与抗生素使用相关性分析[J].中国药物与临床,2012,12(3):285.
    [8] 杨永杰,郝光.医院感染病原菌的耐药性监测分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(7):1497.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(2357) PDF downloads(77) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019

Abstract: Objective To analyze the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital, and provide reference for the rational of antimicrobial drugs and management. Methods The SPSS13.0 software was used for statistical analysis of pathogenic bacteria drug resistance from the detected positive bacteria and its susceptibility test results in my hospital in 2011, combined with the annual antibiotics DDDs to analyze the rationality of antibacterial drug use. Results Among the positive samples were Gram-positive bacteria of 1927, accounting for 33.1% of the 5 822 cases. Separation of Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for in the first place(16.9%), followed by hemolytic Staphylococcus aureus(15.9%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis(14.1%).Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)(36.7%), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci(MRS-con)accounted for 82.5%, were resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, fusidic acid and teicoplanin better sensitivity, resistance rates did not exceed 6.47%;Gram-negative bacteria of 2 661, accounting for 45.7%, the separation of Gram-negative bacteria Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacteria, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae (23.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae(15.6%)and Enterobacter cloacae(3.7%), Enterobacteriaceae inhibitor-containing piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam are kept better sensitivity, resistance rates lower than 27.82%, amikacin rate of less than 14.36%;non-fermenting bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa(10.2%), calcium acetate Bowman Acinetobacter(7.9%) and Stenotrophomonas narrow mainly food Aeromonas.Non-fermenting bacteria to cefoperazone/sulbactam better sensitivity, resistance rates did not exceed 29.44%;Resistance to quinolones rate of more than 31.39%;third and fourth generation cephalosporin resistance rates of non-fermenting bacteria more than 35.19%;imipenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii rate of 81.32%.The most bacterial resistance rates with the use of antibiotics strength was positively correlated(r>0.3, P<0.05). Conclusion Bacterial drug resistance situation was more serious in my hospital.The use and management of antibiotics should be strengthened as soon as possible, and drugs should be selected according to clear pathogens andantimicrobial susceptibility test to reduce drug resistant bacteria produce.

CHEN Hui-jun, ZHU Qi-bing, YU Chang-fa. Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(3): 224-227,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019
Citation: CHEN Hui-jun, ZHU Qi-bing, YU Chang-fa. Analysis of the main pathogenic bacteria resistance rates and antibacterial drugs usage in our hospital in 2011[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(3): 224-227,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.03.019
Reference (8)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return