Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code

GAO Yanxia, SU Juan, JIN Huizi. Study on HPLC fingerprint of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Rubra[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2016, 34(3): 249-251,254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2016.03.014
Citation: WANG Ke-bing, GAO Qun, LI Hao, LU Feng. Study on brand counterfeit drugs detection methods by Raman spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(2): 108-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.02.007

Study on brand counterfeit drugs detection methods by Raman spectroscopy

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.02.007
  • Received Date: 2013-01-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-02-18
  • Objective To established a two-step discriminant method based on SVM and HQI or PCA, in which cephalexin capsules from several domestic manufacturers were used as tool drugs for counterfeits of brand drugs appear on the market. Method In the first step, a simulating classification model of cephalexin brand capsules and 4 kinds of counterfeit drugs was built, the cross-validation accuracy was 95.63%, and prediction accuracy of suspicious samples within the model was 93.75%, and the false-positive rate of additional homemade test samples was 25%. In the second step, the positive samples were applied to HQI and PCA methods, and the false positive rate could be reduced to 5% and 0% respectively. Results and Conclusion The two-step discrimination method established in our study could detected counterfeits of brand drugs efficiently and accurately.
  • [1] 闫冬梅.仿冒知名品牌药的现状与对策分析[J].中国医学科学, 20l 2, 2(2):125.
    [2] Been F, Roggo Y, Degardin K,et al.Profiling of counterfeit medicines by vibrational spectroscopy[J].Forensic Sci Int,2011,211:83.
    [3] Dégardin K,Roggo Y,Been F,et al.Detection and chemical profiling of medicine counterfeits by Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics[J].Anal Chim Acta, 2011,705:334.
    [4] Storme-Parisa I, Rebiereb H, Matogaa M,et al.Challenging Near InfraRed Spectroscopy discriminating ability for counterfeit pharmaceuticals detection[J].Anal Chim Acta,2010,658:163.
    [5] Dégardin K,Roggo Y,Been F,et al.Detection and chemical profiling of medicine counterfeits by Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics[J].Anal Chim Acta,2011,705:334.
    [6] Been F,Roggo Y,Degardin K,et al. Profiling of counterfeit medicines by vibrational spectroscopy[J].Forensic Sci Int,211:83.
    [7] Westerhuis J, Hoefsloot H, Smit S, et al. Assessment of PLS-DA cross validation[J]. Metabolomics,2008,4:81.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.250.50.7511.25Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 89.0 %FULLTEXT: 89.0 %META: 7.6 %META: 7.6 %PDF: 3.4 %PDF: 3.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 20.2 %其他: 20.2 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %India: 0.4 %India: 0.4 %上海: 2.8 %上海: 2.8 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %信阳: 0.2 %信阳: 0.2 %北京: 11.9 %北京: 11.9 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台湾省: 0.2 %台湾省: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.5 %唐山: 1.2 %唐山: 1.2 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %孝感: 0.2 %孝感: 0.2 %安顺: 0.2 %安顺: 0.2 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %梧州: 0.2 %梧州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %漳州: 0.2 %漳州: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %聊城: 0.2 %聊城: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 26.2 %芒廷维尤: 26.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %西宁: 20.5 %西宁: 20.5 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.4 %赤峰: 0.4 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.9 %黄冈: 0.9 %黄冈市麻城: 0.2 %黄冈市麻城: 0.2 %其他ChinaIndia上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐信阳北京南京南宁南昌南通台湾省合肥咸阳唐山大连天津孝感安顺广州张家口惠州成都无锡昆明杭州梧州武汉洛阳济南深圳漳州濮阳盐城石家庄聊城芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州菏泽西宁西安赤峰运城郑州长沙长治黄冈黄冈市麻城Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(3139) PDF downloads(566) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Study on brand counterfeit drugs detection methods by Raman spectroscopy

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.02.007

Abstract: Objective To established a two-step discriminant method based on SVM and HQI or PCA, in which cephalexin capsules from several domestic manufacturers were used as tool drugs for counterfeits of brand drugs appear on the market. Method In the first step, a simulating classification model of cephalexin brand capsules and 4 kinds of counterfeit drugs was built, the cross-validation accuracy was 95.63%, and prediction accuracy of suspicious samples within the model was 93.75%, and the false-positive rate of additional homemade test samples was 25%. In the second step, the positive samples were applied to HQI and PCA methods, and the false positive rate could be reduced to 5% and 0% respectively. Results and Conclusion The two-step discrimination method established in our study could detected counterfeits of brand drugs efficiently and accurately.

GAO Yanxia, SU Juan, JIN Huizi. Study on HPLC fingerprint of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Rubra[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2016, 34(3): 249-251,254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2016.03.014
Citation: WANG Ke-bing, GAO Qun, LI Hao, LU Feng. Study on brand counterfeit drugs detection methods by Raman spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(2): 108-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.02.007
Reference (7)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return