Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
x Close Forever Close
Volume 36 Issue 1
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service  > 2018  >  36(1): 88-92

CAO Chang, WEN Xiaoli, LIN Wenhua, LI Yang, SHI Tao. Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(1): 88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019
Citation: CAO Chang, WEN Xiaoli, LIN Wenhua, LI Yang, SHI Tao. Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(1): 88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019
shu

Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019

  • Department of Pharmacy, Success Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China

  • Received Date: 2017-09-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-10-30
  • Objective To analyze the regularity and characteristics of 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurring in our hospital during 2013-2016, and to explore the factors and causes of ADRs, so as to provide evidence for the continuous improvement of rational use of drugs. Methods 2 621 cases of ADR reports were retrospectively analyzed by monitoring software to extract ADR report source, patient age and sex, related pharmaceutical dosage forms, routes of administration, clinical characterization, organ involvement and other information. The Pareto method was used to identify the main drugs that caused ADR and ADR factorial analysis was performed with Fishbone diagram. Results ADR mainly reported by physicians (2 573 cases, 98.17%) and pharmacists reported at least (3 cases, 0.11%); population aged >70 years accounted for the largest proportion (570 cases, 21.74%); ADR mainly caused by intravenous infusion (1 680 cases, 64.10%). The clinical manifestations were gastrointestinal system lesions(717 cases, 24.17%). Pareto analysis showed that the main drug factors involved anti-infective drugs, anti-neoplastic drugs, Chinese medicine injections and parenteral nutrition drugs. Fishbone analysis showed that elderly patients, intravenous administration, incomplete monitoring and related drugs were the determining factors associated with ARDs. Conclusion The close attention should be paid to monitoring and guidance of special populations, especially the elderly; reducing intravenous forms, monitoring the main factors of medicines, carrying out the individualized medication monitoring, strengthening clinical pharmacy,in order to promote clinical rational use drug and reduce the occurrence of drug-induced diseases.
  • [1] 尼富苓,王霞,田艳平.208例药品不良反应报告分析[J].中国药物应用与监测,2015,12(4):227-230.
    [2] 杨廉平, 练美容, 黄惠明.广东省清远市2008~2010年各年第一季度药品不良反应报告分析[J]. 医药导报2011,30(6):821-823
    [3] 徐萌,郭凤霞,司法启,等.帕累托图分析法在提高我院临床合理用药水平中的应用[J].中国药房2013, 24(5):424-427.
    [4] 刘俊俐, 张贵清, 胡海燕,等. 鱼骨图法应用于肌内注射给药错误的原因分析及对策[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2016,(12):182-184.
    [5] 徐晓华.2012年我院173例药物不良反应报告分析[J].中国实用医药,2014,9(34):11-13.
    [6] 周家梅, 江智霞, 邵星, 等.帕累托图在分级护理质量控制中应用的效果评价[J].中国实用护理杂志, 2013, 29(17):73-74.
    [7] 张菁,吴荣,徐旻. 帕累托图分析法在病房用药安全质量管理中的应用[J].护理研究, 2014, 28(2):232-233.
    [8] 高希花, 张淑丽, 张海燕,等.鱼骨图管理在降低新生儿医源性皮肤损伤中的作用[J].中外医学研究, 2015, 13(6):94-96.
    [9] 孙福珍,张淑玲.老年药品不良反应报告80例分析[J].中国当代医药,2013, 20(3):159-160.
    [10] 朱海静,杨积顺.某三级甲等医院2012-2013年度568例药物不良反应报告分析[J].中国疗养医学, 2014,23(11):1041-1043.
    [11] 张丽心, 田晓红.两例疑似药品不良反应的输液反应分析[J]. 药学服务与研究, 2016,16(2):140,154,157.
    [12] 宋素异,白瑞霞.665例药品不良反应报告回顾性分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2015,15(7):970-971.
    [13] 黄旭慧,蔡加琴,阳丽梅. 临床药师参与口服靶向药物不良反应的管理模式及效果评价[J].中国药学杂志,2015, 50(19):1739-1742.
    [14] 孟蕾, 栾智鹏, 储文功. 基于文献计量的我国医疗机构药品不良反应监测分析.[J]. 药学实践杂志, 2016, 34(3):227-231.
    [15] 王爱军,金永新,要林青.充分发挥临床药师的作用确保肿瘤患者用药安全[J].中国药事,2012,26(2):203-205.
    [16] 徐明琴,陈林,张静霞,等. HPSEC法测定注射用头孢匹胺钠中聚合物的含量[J].国外医药(抗生素分册),2014,35(3):131-133.
    [17] 胥琼. 肿瘤放化疗中的不良反应对策[J].中国医药指南, 2014,12(22):237-238.
    [18] 冯娟,勒毅华,杨瑾,等. 275例抗肿瘤药不良反应分析[J].中国药物与临床,2015,15(8):1186-1188.
    [19] 彭文宣.中药制剂不良反应的监测结果分析和用药管理对策探讨[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2013,33(6):97-98.
    [20] 潘莹,刘韬,梁蔚婷,等.由166例中药不良反应事件/报告分析看中药安全用药[J].中国医院药学杂志,2016,36(2):145-148.
    [21] 秦林飞.中药不良反应原因分析与预防措施[J].中医临床研究,2015,7(35):131-132.
    [22] 刘碧波,蔡国宁,朱建君.251例中药不良反应报告分析[J].中南药学,2007, 5(6):564-566.
    [23] 靳荣.对108份中成药说明书内容的调查与分析[J].中医药管理杂志,2012,20(7):643-644.
    [24] 刘翠丽,田春华,冯红云.医疗机构如何做好药品不良反应监测工作[J].中国药物警戒,2012,9(4):224-226.
    [25] 李旭梅.复方氨基酸注射液致静脉炎反应2例[J].中国药师,2008,11(11):1400.
    [26] 苏庆玲.20AA复方氨基酸注射液不良反应的临床观察及护理措施[J]. 甘肃科技纵横,2015, 44(1):111-112.
    [27] 郦尧旺,陈亚媚,朱光辉.静脉滴注脂肪乳致不良反应70例文献分析[J].中国药业,2010,19(17):58-59.
    [28] 张武标,王晓珉,邵丽丽.127例药物不良反应报告分析[J].临床合理用药杂志,2015,8(26):71-72.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(3714) PDF downloads(971) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019
  • Department of Pharmacy, Success Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
  • Received Date: 2017-09-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-10-30

Abstract: Objective To analyze the regularity and characteristics of 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurring in our hospital during 2013-2016, and to explore the factors and causes of ADRs, so as to provide evidence for the continuous improvement of rational use of drugs. Methods 2 621 cases of ADR reports were retrospectively analyzed by monitoring software to extract ADR report source, patient age and sex, related pharmaceutical dosage forms, routes of administration, clinical characterization, organ involvement and other information. The Pareto method was used to identify the main drugs that caused ADR and ADR factorial analysis was performed with Fishbone diagram. Results ADR mainly reported by physicians (2 573 cases, 98.17%) and pharmacists reported at least (3 cases, 0.11%); population aged >70 years accounted for the largest proportion (570 cases, 21.74%); ADR mainly caused by intravenous infusion (1 680 cases, 64.10%). The clinical manifestations were gastrointestinal system lesions(717 cases, 24.17%). Pareto analysis showed that the main drug factors involved anti-infective drugs, anti-neoplastic drugs, Chinese medicine injections and parenteral nutrition drugs. Fishbone analysis showed that elderly patients, intravenous administration, incomplete monitoring and related drugs were the determining factors associated with ARDs. Conclusion The close attention should be paid to monitoring and guidance of special populations, especially the elderly; reducing intravenous forms, monitoring the main factors of medicines, carrying out the individualized medication monitoring, strengthening clinical pharmacy,in order to promote clinical rational use drug and reduce the occurrence of drug-induced diseases.

CAO Chang, WEN Xiaoli, LIN Wenhua, LI Yang, SHI Tao. Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(1): 88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019
Citation: CAO Chang, WEN Xiaoli, LIN Wenhua, LI Yang, SHI Tao. Analysis on 2 621 cases of adverse drug reaction reports by Fishbone and Pareto diagram[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(1): 88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.01.019
shu

    HTML

Reference (28)

Catalog

    版权所有：《药学实践与服务》编辑委员会

    Supervisor & Sponsors: Address: No 325 Guohe Road, ShanghaiPost Code: 200433

    Tel: （021）81871324,81871397 E-mail: yxsjzzs@163.com

    网站备案号 沪ICP备05003363号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return