Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
x Close Forever Close
Volume 31 Issue 4
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service  > 2013  >  31(4): 314-317

LU Juan, HUANG Wei-can, WANG Yue. Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(4): 314-317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022
Citation: LU Juan, HUANG Wei-can, WANG Yue. Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(4): 314-317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022
shu

Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022

  • Training Department, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

  • Received Date: 2012-07-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-11-14
  • Objective To compare different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists'credentials for military superior technical position. Methods Delphi method was taken to organize two rounds of specialist consultations, the final opinions of specialists with different professional ranks were compared on the index weights. Results In comparison of opinions about six first-level indicators (W=0.906, P=0.107), the specialists agreed that pharmaceutical work and professional knowledge were the most important. For the second-level indicators like professional knowledge, pharmaceutical work and teaching, the opinions were also consistent (W=1, P=0.092; W=1, P=0.157; W=1, P=0.135). For the second-level indicators like ideology and mortality, scientific research and the third-level indicators like quantity of pharmaceutical work, quality of pharmaceutical work and teaching achievements, the opinions were different(W=0.75, P=0.223; W=0.75, P=0.223; W=0.75, P=0.223;W=0.1, P=0.896; W=0, P=1). Conclusion The experts with different professional ranks had different opinions, especially on the aspects of quality of pharmaceutical work and teaching achievements. Those with medium professional titles focused more on shorter term indicators, while those with senior ones focused more on longer term indicators. These suggestions should be appropriately analyzed to build scientific pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position.
  • [1] 丁 果.浅谈湖北省卫生专业高级职称评审的现状[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2008,19(5):100.
    [2] Frith L.Priority setting and evidence based purchasing[J].Health care analysis,1999,7:139.
    [3] 余璐璐,彭 彬,姚 锐.卫生专业高级职称评审中实行量化标准的思考[J].咸宁学院学报,2009,10:164.
    [4] 罗 琳,梁 旭.卫生专业技术职务评聘指标及机制研究[J].中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(5):631.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1898) PDF downloads(258) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022
  • Training Department, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received Date: 2012-07-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-11-14

Abstract: Objective To compare different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists'credentials for military superior technical position. Methods Delphi method was taken to organize two rounds of specialist consultations, the final opinions of specialists with different professional ranks were compared on the index weights. Results In comparison of opinions about six first-level indicators (W=0.906, P=0.107), the specialists agreed that pharmaceutical work and professional knowledge were the most important. For the second-level indicators like professional knowledge, pharmaceutical work and teaching, the opinions were also consistent (W=1, P=0.092; W=1, P=0.157; W=1, P=0.135). For the second-level indicators like ideology and mortality, scientific research and the third-level indicators like quantity of pharmaceutical work, quality of pharmaceutical work and teaching achievements, the opinions were different(W=0.75, P=0.223; W=0.75, P=0.223; W=0.75, P=0.223;W=0.1, P=0.896; W=0, P=1). Conclusion The experts with different professional ranks had different opinions, especially on the aspects of quality of pharmaceutical work and teaching achievements. Those with medium professional titles focused more on shorter term indicators, while those with senior ones focused more on longer term indicators. These suggestions should be appropriately analyzed to build scientific pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position.

LU Juan, HUANG Wei-can, WANG Yue. Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(4): 314-317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022
Citation: LU Juan, HUANG Wei-can, WANG Yue. Comparison of different experts' opinions about pharmaceutical specialists' credentials for military superior technical position[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2013, 31(4): 314-317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2013.04.022
shu

    HTML

Reference (4)

Catalog

    版权所有：《药学实践与服务》编辑委员会

    Supervisor & Sponsors: Address: No 325 Guohe Road, ShanghaiPost Code: 200433

    Tel: （021）81871324,81871397 E-mail: yxsjzzs@163.com

    网站备案号 沪ICP备05003363号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return