复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究

陈静; 严佳; 钟桂香; 宋洪涛

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

x 关闭永久关闭

应中央军委要求，2022年9月起，《药学实践杂志》将更名为《药学实践与服务》，双月刊，正文96页；2023年1月起，拟出版月刊，正文64页，数据库收录情况与原《药学实践杂志》相同。欢迎作者踊跃投稿！

复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究

陈静, 严佳, 钟桂香, 宋洪涛

文章导航 > 药学实践与服务 > 2019 > 37(4): 357-360,369

陈静, 严佳, 钟桂香, 宋洪涛. 复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究[J]. 药学实践与服务, 2019, 37(4): 357-360,369. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

引用本文:

CHEN Jing, ZHONG Guixiang, YAN Jia, SONG Hongtao. Validation of microbial limit test for compound terbinafine gel[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2019, 37(4): 357-360,369. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

Citation:

CHEN Jing, ZHONG Guixiang, YAN Jia, SONG Hongtao. Validation of microbial limit test for compound terbinafine gel[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2019, 37(4): 357-360,369. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院, 福建福州 350025

基金项目: 军队医疗机构制剂标准提高科研专项课题（14ZJZ17）

Validation of microbial limit test for compound terbinafine gel

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital 900 of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Fuzhou 350025, China

摘要: 目的建立复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法。方法根据《中国药典》2015年版四部通则1105、1106、1107具体规则作为检测依据。对薄膜过滤冲洗液体积、供试液稀释级、中和剂的含量等进行考察。结果该产品对5种试验菌种均有抑制作用。加入适量聚山梨酯80作为中和剂，同时采用薄膜过滤法可有效去除其抗菌性。需氧菌总数计数采用1∶100稀释级供试液10 ml，冲洗量300 ml。霉菌及酵母菌采用1∶20稀释级供试液10 ml，冲洗量800 ml。5种试验菌株的回收比值均在0.5～2.0之间。控制菌中金黄色葡萄球菌采用1∶10稀释级供试液10 ml （冲洗量1 000 ml/膜）合并培养基稀释法（600 ml）进行检测，铜绿假单胞菌采用1∶10稀释级供试液10 ml/膜（冲洗量300 ml/膜）进行检测。结论该方法可作为复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度的检查方法。
- 复方特比萘芬软膏 /
- 微生物限度检查 /
- 薄膜过滤法 /
- 聚山梨酯80
Abstract: Objective To establish a microbial limit test method for compound terbinafine gel. Methods The test was carried out according to the requirements of provision 1105,1106 and 1107 of rules of preparation in volume IV of Chinese pharmacopoeia 2015 edition.Experiments were made to observe the volume of rinsing solution,dilution ratio of the test solution and the content of the neutralizing agent. Results Compound terbinafine gel had antimicrobial activities on five tested strains.The method of neutralizing agent polysorbate 80 and film filtration could eliminate the bacteriostatic of the drug.The total number of aerobic bacteria was measured by 10 ml of 1:100 diluted solution and 300 ml washing solution.The total number of molds and yeasts were measured using 10 ml of 1:20 diluted solution and 800 ml washing solution.The recovery ratio of five test bacteria was within a range from 0.5 to 2.0.Staphylococcus aureus of the controlled bacteria was measured by10 ml of 1:10 diluted solution and 1 000 ml washing solution,as well as using increased cultural volume (600 ml).Pseudomonas aeruginosa of the controlled bacteria was measured by 10 ml from 1:10 diluted solution and 300 ml washing solution. Conclusion The method was suitable for the microbial limit test of compound terbinafine gel.
- compound terbinafine gel /
- microbial limit test /
- membrane filtration /
- polysorbate 80

[1]	尹斌,冉玉平.1%特比萘芬乳膏对常见皮肤癣菌、球形孢子丝菌及裴氏着色真菌的体外抑菌活性研究[J].皮肤病与性病,2015,37(3):130-132.
[2]	周琳.莫匹罗星乳膏外用治疗细菌性皮肤病临床疗效观察[J].中华临床医师杂志,2016,10(4):235-236.
[3]	国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典(2015年版四部)[S].北京:化学工业出版社,2015:136~151.
[4]	杨晓莉,李辉,马英英,等.中国药典2015年版非无菌产品微生物限度检查:微生物计数法解读[J].药物分析杂志,2016,36(6):1101-1107.
[5]	廖祥茹,陈晨,李旸,等.聚山梨酯80在微生物限度检查中的应用[J].中国药师,2014,17(10):1776-1777.
[6]	钱文静,张玫,袁耀佐.盐酸特比萘酚凝胶微生物限度检查方法的验证[J].药物分析杂志,2008,28(12):2135-2139.
[7]	张力.特比萘芬片与特比萘芬乳膏治疗皮肤癣菌病的疗效对比[J].中国药业,2013,22(9):69-70.
[8]	李辉,杨晓莉,梁泽梅,等.不同剂型硝酸咪康唑微生物限度检查方法适用性研究与评价[J].中国抗生素杂志,2018,43(1):80-84.
[9]	汤茜,李瑞莲.盐酸莫西沙星片微生物限度方法适用性研究[J].国外医药抗生素分册,2016,37(4):172-176.
[10]	马仕洪,刘鹏,胡昌勤,等.药品微生物限度检查方法适用性试验中加菌方式的实验研究[J].药物分析杂志,2018,38(5):877-872.

[1]	刘琳琳, 严佳, 周欣. 自制复方特比萘酚软膏渗透促进剂的研究 . 药学实践与服务, 2021, 39(1): 58-61, 72. doi: 10.12206/j.issn.1006-0111.202008062
[2]	严佳, 宋洪涛, 周欣. 用HPLC法同时测定自制复方特比萘酚软膏中3个主药成分的含量 . 药学实践与服务, 2021, 39(3): 267-269, 279. doi: 10.12206/j.issn.1006-0111.202007109
[3]	陈静, 严佳, 钟桂香, 宋洪涛. 6种医院制剂微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究 . 药学实践与服务, 2019, 37(6): 527-531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.06.011
[4]	黄雄伟, 高静华, 高春红. 复方间苯二酚洗剂微生物存活性考察 . 药学实践与服务, 2016, 34(1): 76-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2016.01.020
[5]	陈雅琳, 冯旭, 陈虹, 栾洁, 赵龙, 汪家春. 复方红景天口服液微生物限度检查方法的验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2016, 34(2): 177-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2016.02.020
[6]	张国庆, 杜建红, 祝辉, 刘徽, 方晨. 稀苯扎溴铵溶液微生物限度检查方法的建立及方法学验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2014, 32(5): 368-371. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2014.05.015
[7]	何进, 任雪, 曹家辅, 安晔, 刘瑞霞. 水调散微生物限度检查的方法验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2014, 32(4): 282-283,317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2014.04.011
[8]	檀巧婷, 严佳, 周欣, 宋洪涛. 快立洁手消毒凝胶的微生物限度检查方法学验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2014, 32(5): 366-367,382. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2014.05.014
[9]	苗浩, 曹颖瑛, 商庆华, 姜远英. 植物中萘醌类化合物及其衍生物的抗微生物作用的研究进展 . 药学实践与服务, 2012, 30(5): 334-335,360. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2012.05.004
[10]	郭志鑫, 孙会敏, 杨锐, 高志峰, 王华. 药用辅料聚山梨酯80(吐温80)质量状况分析 . 药学实践与服务, 2012, 30(6): 459-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2012.06.019
[11]	何进, 史国兵, 高军, 杨晓东. 复方参芪五味咀嚼片微生物限度检查的方法验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2011, 29(5): 369-371.
[12]	严佳, 钟桂香, 贺全山, 余小妹. 我国药品微生物限度检查的发展历程 . 药学实践与服务, 2010, 28(3): 211-212,214.
[13]	解翠珠, 程静. 紫草婴儿凝胶及软膏的微生物限度检查方法学验证 . 药学实践与服务, 2008, (2): 136-137,150.
[14]	李虹, 唐雯. 中药袋装煎煮液的微生物限度检查 . 药学实践与服务, 2007, (3): 156-158.
[15]	严炎中, 吴晓晔, 娄牡英, 马文娟. 考察颠茄合剂三种处方对微生物限度检查的影响 . 药学实践与服务, 2003, (3): 152-153.
[16]	赵爱国, 顾超宁, 徐美娟, 胡宁. 微生物法和荧光偏振免疫法测定丁胺卡那霉素血药浓度的相关性 . 药学实践与服务, 1995, (4): 231-234.
[17]	傅翔, 张钧. 口服环丙氟哌酸和注射抗微生物药物在临床、微生物学和经济学方面的检查比较 . 药学实践与服务, 1994, (2): 34-39.
[18]	崔熙. 地锦草中的抗微生物成分 . 药学实践与服务, 1988, (2): 55-55.
[19]	李以欣. 抗微生物药物的选择 . 药学实践与服务, 1985, (2): 8-18.
[20]	刘海友, 郭步英. 药液中微生物的增殖 . 药学实践与服务, 1983, (3): 63-63.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 2972
HTML全文浏览量: 340
PDF下载量: 345
被引次数: 0

复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法适用性试验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2019.04.014

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院, 福建福州 350025

基金项目: 军队医疗机构制剂标准提高科研专项课题（14ZJZ17）

收稿日期: 2018-12-27
修回日期: 2019-06-06

关键词:

摘要: 目的建立复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度检查方法。方法根据《中国药典》2015年版四部通则1105、1106、1107具体规则作为检测依据。对薄膜过滤冲洗液体积、供试液稀释级、中和剂的含量等进行考察。结果该产品对5种试验菌种均有抑制作用。加入适量聚山梨酯80作为中和剂，同时采用薄膜过滤法可有效去除其抗菌性。需氧菌总数计数采用1∶100稀释级供试液10 ml，冲洗量300 ml。霉菌及酵母菌采用1∶20稀释级供试液10 ml，冲洗量800 ml。5种试验菌株的回收比值均在0.5～2.0之间。控制菌中金黄色葡萄球菌采用1∶10稀释级供试液10 ml （冲洗量1 000 ml/膜）合并培养基稀释法（600 ml）进行检测，铜绿假单胞菌采用1∶10稀释级供试液10 ml/膜（冲洗量300 ml/膜）进行检测。结论该方法可作为复方特比萘芬软膏微生物限度的检查方法。

English Abstract

Validation of microbial limit test for compound terbinafine gel

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital 900 of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Fuzhou 350025, China

Received Date: 2018-12-27
Rev Recd Date: 2019-06-06

Keywords:

Abstract: Objective To establish a microbial limit test method for compound terbinafine gel. Methods The test was carried out according to the requirements of provision 1105,1106 and 1107 of rules of preparation in volume IV of Chinese pharmacopoeia 2015 edition.Experiments were made to observe the volume of rinsing solution,dilution ratio of the test solution and the content of the neutralizing agent. Results Compound terbinafine gel had antimicrobial activities on five tested strains.The method of neutralizing agent polysorbate 80 and film filtration could eliminate the bacteriostatic of the drug.The total number of aerobic bacteria was measured by 10 ml of 1:100 diluted solution and 300 ml washing solution.The total number of molds and yeasts were measured using 10 ml of 1:20 diluted solution and 800 ml washing solution.The recovery ratio of five test bacteria was within a range from 0.5 to 2.0.Staphylococcus aureus of the controlled bacteria was measured by10 ml of 1:10 diluted solution and 1 000 ml washing solution,as well as using increased cultural volume (600 ml).Pseudomonas aeruginosa of the controlled bacteria was measured by 10 ml from 1:10 diluted solution and 300 ml washing solution. Conclusion The method was suitable for the microbial limit test of compound terbinafine gel.

引用本文: