Comparison of the drug for infection prevention in combat injuries between the PLA and USA Armed Force
-
摘要: 目的 比较中、美军队战伤感染防治用药的差别,吸取有价值的信息和经验。 方法 对中、美两军战伤感染的防治用药指南进行比较,分析两者差异。 结果 两军在战伤感染防治用药方面略有不同,主要表现在阶梯救治用药和不同伤部用药上。 结论 美军战伤感染用药指南在感染防治的临床路径和给药细则方面可供借鉴。Abstract: Objective To compare the differences in the drug utilization for infection prevention in combat injuries between the PLA and USA armed force. Methods The guidelines for the prevention of infections associated with combat-related injuries and tactical medical emergency protocols of USA armed force were compared with the combat injury treatment regulation of PLA. Results There are some differences between the prevention and medicine use of war injure infection of Chinese and American Armed Force, especially in variety selection and principle of drug selection in different echelon. Conclusion The references could be taken from the principle of drug utilization of prevention and treatment in combat injuries from USA Armed Force.
-
Key words:
- combat injuries /
- infection /
- prevention /
- medicine use /
- comparison
-
[1] 总后勤部卫生部.战伤分类及判断标准[S].2007:1. [2] 扈长茂,陈国良,贺 祥.军队卫生勤务学[M].上海:第二军医大学出版社,2007:37. [3] Duane R, Clinton K, Romney C,et al.Executive summary:guidelines for the prevention of infections associated with combat-related injuries:2011 update[J].J Trauma,2011(71):202-209. [4] 总后勤部卫生部.战伤救治规则[S].2006:1. [5] U.S. Special Operations Command. Tactical medical emergency protocols for special operations advanced tactical practitioners (ATPs)[J].J Spec Oper Med,2010:1-179. [6] 张永信.根据药物在不同部位的浓度选择抗菌药[J].中国社区医师,2013(7):20.
计量
- 文章访问数: 2258
- HTML全文浏览量: 222
- PDF下载量: 67
- 被引次数: 0